Publication summary
40% 10 analyzed articles/videos 3,799 analyzed words
BS Summary: These StateScoop results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 1,222 hits . Analysis detected 11,068 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,264 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 33% (389 of 577 publications). This StateScoop is better (less manipulative) than 67.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 23,264
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
33% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.6% percentile 1.1% BS Score10 analyzed articles23.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst