Publication summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Little Apple Post results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 317 hits. Analysis detected 2,412 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,602 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 410 publications). This Little Apple Post is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Little Apple Post
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%Capital B News1%
1%Spotlight Delaware1%
1%The Banner1%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
0%Little Apple Post (selected)0%
Publication details
Total words: 1,602
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Publication 15.4%15.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 19.8%19.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 5.2%5.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 1.9%1.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Publication 6.0%6.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Publication 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 5.0%5.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 19.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 19.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 16.7%, sitewide 15.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 15.4%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos