Publication summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These LAist results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Optimism Bias , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.5% saturation with 192 hits . Analysis detected 1,105 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 410 publications). This LAist is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 1,836
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Publication 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 10.5% 10.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 10.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 8.9%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 0.4% Composition/Division: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 0.5% Unattributed Quote: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 0.5%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst