Publication summary
⁠65%2 analyzed articles/videos1,524 analyzed words
BS Summary: These International Business Times UK results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16.8% saturation with 920 hits. Analysis detected 4,569 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,485 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (108 of 410 publications). This International Business Times UK is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
International Business Times UK
Publication ranking list
Publication details
Total words: 5,485
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

74% percentile
025507510073.8% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 10.1%10.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.4%2.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 10.4%10.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 5.9%5.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Publication 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Publication 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Publication 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 10.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 16.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Unattributed Quote: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos