Publication summary
91% 1 analyzed article/video 1,134 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Healthcare Dive results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 388 hits . Analysis detected 3,107 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,402 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 79% (89 of 410 publications). This Healthcare Dive is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 3,402
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.5% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.1% 0.1% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Publication 6.0% 6.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 6.6% 6.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 9.6%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Burden of Proof: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 0.4% Optimism Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst