Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,489 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Franklin Prosperity Report results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Overconfidence Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 41.6% saturation with 3,109 hits . Analysis detected 19,945 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,467 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of 97% (13 of 379 publications). This The Franklin Prosperity Report is worse (more manipulative) than 96.80% of the peer group. The Franklin Prosperity Report Publication details
Total words: 7,467
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
97% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 96.8% percentile 6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 41.6% 41.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 27.1% 27.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 22.1% 22.1% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Publication 15.4% 15.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 16.9% 16.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Publication 11.3% 11.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Publication 10.6% 10.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 15.6% 15.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 14.2% 14.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 41.6%, sitewide 0.5% Hasty Generalization: Publication 27.1%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 22.1%, sitewide 4.6% Negativity Bias: Publication 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 18.9%, sitewide 15.9% Anchoring Bias: Publication 16.9%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Publication 15.6%, sitewide 6.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 15.4%, sitewide 2.5% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 14.2%, sitewide 5.3% Burden of Proof: Publication 11.3%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Authority: Publication 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Publication 10.6%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 1.1% False Dilemma: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 1.5% Halo Effect: Publication 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst