Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,489 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Allen results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 41.6% saturation with 3,109 hits. Analysis detected 19,945 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,467 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (642 of 6,136 authors). This Matthew Allen is worse (more manipulative) than 89.60% of the peer group.
Matthew Allen
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠90%Matthew Allen (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,467
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

90% percentile
025507510089.6% percentile
6.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 41.6%41.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.7%5.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 27.1%27.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 22.1%22.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Author 15.4%15.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 16.9%16.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 11.3%11.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 10.6%10.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 15.6%15.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 14.2%14.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 41.6%, sitewide 0.5%Hasty Generalization: Author 27.1%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Author 22.1%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 18.9%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 16.9%, sitewide 4.0%Optimism Bias: Author 15.6%, sitewide 6.0%Loss Aversion: Author 15.4%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.2%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Author 11.3%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Author 10.6%, sitewide 0.0%Availability Heuristic: Author 9.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.5%Halo Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos