Publication summary
87% 737 analyzed articles/videos 452,835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fox Nation results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 249,128 hits . Analysis detected 2,293,792 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,072,558 analyzed words across 732 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 55% (171 of 379 publications). This Fox Nation is worse (more manipulative) than 55.00% of the peer group. Fox Nation
Publication details
Total words: 2,072,558
Article count: 732
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
55% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.0% percentile 2.0% BS Score732 analyzed articles2.1M analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 12.0% 12.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.6% 3.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.1% 4.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 12.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst