Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 701 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Erie News Now results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 555 hits . Analysis detected 2,811 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,804 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 80% (84 of 410 publications). This Erie News Now is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,804
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.7% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Publication 12.4% 12.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 19.8% 19.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 19.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 15.9% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 12.4%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 4.7%, sitewide 0.8% Straw Man: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 0.9% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 0.4% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst