Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Chemical & Engineering News results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 170 hits . Analysis detected 1,117 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,641 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 410 publications). This Chemical & Engineering News is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Chemical & Engineering News Publication details
Total words: 1,641
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 10.4% 10.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.9% 3.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 5.7% 5.7% Middle Ground Sitewide 0.1% Publication 3.0% 3.0% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Publication 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 10.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 8.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Middle Ground: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 0.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Begging the Question: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Red Herring: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 0.7% Primacy Effect: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 0.9% Hindsight Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst