Publication summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Arab American Institute results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Politically Left Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 670 hits . Analysis detected 3,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,298 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 410 publications). This Arab American Institute is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 2,298
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 29.2% 29.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 13.2% 13.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 21.4% 21.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 9.4% 9.4% Politically Left Leaning ⌠Sitewide 2.0% Publication 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 8.0% 8.0% Fundamental Attribution E⌠Sitewide 2.7% Publication 10.1% 10.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 29.2%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Publication 13.2%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Publication 21.4%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Publication 9.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 10.9%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 10.1%, sitewide 2.7% Availability Heuristic: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 8.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst