Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These American Greatness results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 867 hits . Analysis detected 7,279 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 75% (105 of 410 publications). This American Greatness is worse (more manipulative) than 74.60% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 6,020
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 74.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 4.7% 4.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Publication 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.4% 6.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 12.3% 12.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 13.7% 13.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 14.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Publication 13.7%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 10.9%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Slippery Slope: Publication 6.5%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Publication 5.9%, sitewide 1.5% Anecdotal: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 0.9% Indoctrination: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst