Keyword summary
68% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,103 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Working Class Voters results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.7% saturation with 2,890 hits . Analysis detected 17,756 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,305 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (20,105 of 37,533 keywords). This Working Class Voters is better (less manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group. Working Class Voters
Keyword details
Total words: 13,305
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.7% 21.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 16.1% 16.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst