Keyword summary
30% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,705 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wire Fraud results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 2,174 hits . Analysis detected 12,097 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,351 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (26,977 of 37,536 keywords). This Wire Fraud is better (less manipulative) than 71.90% of the peer group. Wire Fraud
Keyword details
Total words: 14,351
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles14.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst