Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,263 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wild Fires results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 56.2% saturation with 2,126 hits . Analysis detected 7,490 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,786 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.9% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,965 of 36,379 keywords). This Wild Fires is worse (more manipulative) than 94.60% of the peer group. Wild Fires
Keyword details
Total words: 3,786
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
95% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.6% percentile 9.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 56.1% 56.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 27.3% 27.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 13.2% 13.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 22.6% 22.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 16.1% 16.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Negativity Bias: Keyword 56.1%, sitewide 19.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 27.3%, sitewide 9.1% Framing Effect: Keyword 23.0%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 13.2%, sitewide 4.0% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 1.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 2.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst