Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These While Trump Declares Deal Is Close results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Optimism Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 512 hits. Analysis detected 2,908 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,558 keywords). This While Trump Declares Deal Is Close is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
While Trump Declares Deal Is Close
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%While Trump Declares Deal Is Close (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,196
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.0%1.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.6%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos