Keyword summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,402 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Washington Hilton results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Authority, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 2,206 hits. Analysis detected 9,488 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,660 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (24,554 of 34,637 keywords). This Washington Hilton is better (less manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group.
Washington Hilton
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠30%Washington Hilton (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

29% percentile
025507510029.1% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.0%4.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos