Keyword summary
76% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,236 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Warfare results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.8% saturation with 1,714 hits . Analysis detected 10,345 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,868 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,299 of 37,536 keywords). This Warfare is worse (more manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Warfare
Keyword details
Total words: 7,868
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.2% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.8% 21.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst