Keyword summary
70% 2 analyzed articles/videos 772 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Voter Id Law results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.1% saturation with 833 hits . Analysis detected 7,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,873 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (21,347 of 37,536 keywords). This Voter Id Law is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. Voter Id Law
Keyword details
Total words: 6,873
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.1% percentile 2.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.0% 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst