Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,158 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Venezuelan Political Crisis results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 45.4% saturation with 4,677 hits . Analysis detected 18,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,313 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 72% (10,771 of 37,536 keywords). This Venezuelan Political Crisis is worse (more manipulative) than 71.30% of the peer group. Venezuelan Political Crisis
Keyword details
Total words: 10,313
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.3% percentile 4.1% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 45.4% 45.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 14.7% 14.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.5% 15.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 45.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 14.7%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 1.4% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst