Keyword summary
63% 15 analyzed articles/videos 6,838 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utah Democratic Party results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 4,225 hits . Analysis detected 45,772 faulty-reasoning hits from 55,817 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (31,195 of 34,429 keywords). This Utah Democratic Party is better (less manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group. Utah Democratic Party
Keyword details
Total words: 55,817
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.4% percentile 1.5% BS Score14 analyzed articles55.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst