Keyword summary
68% 4 analyzed articles/videos 101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US House results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Slippery Slope , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 867 hits . Analysis detected 5,260 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,825 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (18,489 of 34,595 keywords). This US House is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group. US House
Keyword details
Total words: 5,825
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.2% 12.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Slippery Slope: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst