Author summary
68%1 analyzed article/video101 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Pearce results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Biased Writer Voice, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 278 faulty-reasoning hits from 303 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 8.3% and a BS Rank of 93% (478 of 6,629 authors). This Matthew Pearce is worse (more manipulative) than 92.80% of the peer group.
Matthew Pearce
Author details
Ranking context
Position among analyzed authors
8.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles303 analyzed words
Reasoning profile
Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
Sitewide departure map
Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often