Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Upstate results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Anecdotal , and Ad Hominem , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 1,070 hits . Analysis detected 12,230 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,012 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 16% (31,790 of 37,536 keywords). This Upstate is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group. Upstate
Keyword details
Total words: 15,012
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles15K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst