Keyword summary
33% 2 analyzed articles/videos 760 analyzed words
BS Summary: These University Of Pennsylvania results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 189 hits . Analysis detected 1,417 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,280 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 46% (20,405 of 37,536 keywords). This University Of Pennsylvania is better (less manipulative) than 54.40% of the peer group. University Of Pennsylvania
Keyword details
Total words: 2,280
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
46% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 45.6% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 3.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 0.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst