Keyword summary
85% 10 analyzed articles/videos 4,417 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United States House Of Representatives results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 3,281 hits . Analysis detected 24,380 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,161 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 29% (25,693 of 35,771 keywords). This United States House Of Representatives is better (less manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group. United States House Of Representatives
Keyword details
Total words: 23,161
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.2% percentile 2.1% BS Score10 analyzed articles23.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.2% 14.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst