BS Summary: This article contains 37 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 26.1% saturation with 349 hits. Analysis detected 2,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,337 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 70.8% and a BS Rank of 79% (4,587 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the article peer group.

MEMPHIS, Tenn. 
(AP)  For 21 years, Steve Fowler and Sam Wilson have performed together in a band on Memphis’ renowned Beale Street. 
And for the past decade, the men have been neighbors on a quiet, leafy avenue. 
But as of Thursday, they will no longer cast the same ballot despite living across the street from each other. 
That’s because Tennessee’s Republican-controlled legislature redrew the congressional district of Memphis, which has long enjoyed its own Democratic-leaning U.S. 
House seat. 
Now, the city is split into three Republican-leaning districts, its majority-Black population sliced up and bound to mostly white, rural and conservative communities along lines that branch away from Fowler and Wilson’s East Memphis neighborhood. 
A line runs down the middle of the street, placing Fowler in the 8th Congressional District, which runs hundreds of miles to central Tennessee across a dozen counties. 
Wilson is zoned for the 9th District, which extends across most of the state’s southern border before curving up to encompass the largely white and affluent Nashville suburbs. 
“I think it’s horrible,” said Fowler, who is white. 
“This isn’t just going to be bad for Black folks in Memphis, but poor whites in these new districts also aren’t going to get services. 
How are any of these congressmen going to serve all these different counties?” 
The redraw was sparked by a ruling from the conservative majority of the U.S. 
Supreme Court that may be a death knell for congressional representation of majority-Black Southern communities such as Memphis. 
For 60 years, a provision of the landmark Voting Rights Act required mapmakers to prove they were not discriminating against racial minorities in how they drew districts, often leading to political boundaries that allowed some minority communities to vote for their preferred representative rather than having their vote diluted by white majorities surrounding them. 
On April 29, the justices severely weakened that requirement, ruling that the way courts had handled it improperly injected racial matters into redistricting in violation of the U.S. 
Constitution. 
Republicans across the South immediately leaped at the chance to redraw their maps before the November elections to eliminate as many Democratic-held, majority-minority congressional seats as possible. 
Tennessee’s legislature was the first in a GOP-controlled state to finalize a new map. 
But it is one of several Southern states  Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, Mississippi and South Carolina among them  engaged in a broader partisan redistricting competition sweeping the country. 
Republicans have long complained that the Voting Rights Act prevented them from doing to Democratic, majority-Black districts what Democrats in states they control do to conservative-leaning, white and rural areas  scatter their voters for partisan gain. 
That is what Tennessee Republicans did in their initial congressional map in 2021 to the state’s other large reservoir of Democrats in Nashville, where they did not have to step gingerly because that city is majority white. 
“Tennessee is a conservative state and our congressional delegation should reflect that,” said Republican state Sen. 
John Stevens, who shepherded the bill for a new map that made all nine congressional districts solidly Republican. 
Wilson, the Memphis musician who is Black, was less distraught by the carving up of his neighborhood for partisan purposes. 
He saw the move as just another trial facing the city after a surge of federal agents sent by President Donald Trump to combat crime and amid narratives about Memphis’ safety from neighboring suburbs and Republican state lawmakers. 
“It’s a hustling community. 
We’re going to make ends meet for our families,” Wilson said. 
“The legacy of Memphis is music and our civil rights history,” he said, adding the two were intertwined. 
“Hard times mean you’re going to try and find your gift. 
That’s what we do here; music in Memphis is a way of life.” 
The Memphis district predates the Voting Rights Act. 
For at least a century, well before Congress acted to protect minority voting rights, Tennessee has believed it made sense for its metropolis on the Mississippi River to have its own U.S. 
House district. 
But since that law was passed in 1965, anyone who tried to split up the district for partisan gain could be sued and have the maps thrown out. 
Now, legal experts say that is not much of a risk. 
Nonetheless, Democrats and civil rights groups are suing to block the map. 
The symbolism is especially sharp as the city is home to the National Civil Rights Museum, built around the motel where the Rev. 
Martin Luther King Jr. was assassinated in 1968. 
When the legislature passed the new maps, Democrats and protesters shouted “hands off Memphis!” 
and waved signs accusing Republicans of bringing back Jim Crow. 
“Memphis is not just any city; it holds a central place in the national story of our quest for racial justice in this country and how, over time, we have increasingly achieved civil, voting, and economic rights for all Americans,” said Eric Holder, a former U.S. attorney general who chairs the National Democratic Redistricting Committee. 
“Black citizens protested, marched and died there for the right to vote.” 
Memphis has faced dual stories in recent years. 
Billions of dollars in private investment and federal dollars have flooded into the area in recent years, but many local businesses still express concerns about a lagging regional economy. 
Residents who spoke with The Associated Press expressed concerns about safety and public services but bristled at stereotypes about rampant crime. 
The twin stories are often on display in the river city, where pothole-filled streets run from empty storefronts to ornate mansion-filled neighborhoods and leafy college campuses only blocks away. 
The city has long had a contentious relationship with the rest of the state, which voted for Trump in 2024 by a roughly 2-1 margin. 
The conservative legislature in Nashville has clashed repeatedly with Memphis and accused its leaders of broad mismanagement. 
The legislature passed a law blocking many police overhaul efforts in Memphis that were put in place after the death of Tyre Nichols, an unarmed Black man, at the hands of city officers in 2023. 
It passed another measure seizing control of Memphis’ airport board and those of other cities across the state, and gave the state attorney general, also a Republican, the power to remove Memphis’ elected district attorney. 
“The state legislature is trying to take it over,” said U.S. 
Rep. 
Steve Cohen, the white Democrat who still represents the city in Congress until the new lines kick in after the midterms. 
“And that’s absurd. 
It was all partially because it’s a majority Black city.” 
Thomas Goodman, a politics and law professor at Rhodes College in Memphis, notes that the new congressional districts may lead to greater friction over who receives attention  and funding  from lawmakers. 
Memphis residents will soon share districts with Republican towns with starkly different economies, geographies and demographics. 
Whoever holds those congressional seats will have an incentive to pay attention to those voters and not to Memphis’ population. 
“It would not only deprive Black Tennesseans of proper representation,” Goodman said. 
“These changes also break up the city of Memphis as an entity into multiple districts, thereby removing a dedicated agent in government who knows the people, who understands their concerns and can speak for them and deliver on behalf of their interests and desires.” 
Chris Wiley’s house sits in what was, before this week, a quiet street in Midtown Memphis dotted with duplexes, tidy lawns and sports fields. 
Now his neighborhood is carved apart at the intersection of three congressional districts. 
That is not surprising, he said, because “Tennessee is all about the dollar” rather than residents. 
“Memphis is majority Black, so if you mess with that, what’s the point of even voting in Tennessee?” 
said Wiley, a 29-year-old sports stadium worker who is Black. 
“Whatever the congressional numbers, whatever that is, we don’t count on the scale as high, anyway.” 
____ 
Associated Press writer Nicholas Riccardi in Denver and AP videojournalist Sophie Bates contributed to this report. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.1%Matt Brown: 4.2%AP News: 2.0%Confirmation Bias6.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 0.4%AP News: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Matt Brown: 2.0%AP News: 2.7%Availability Heuristic5.0%This article: 17.8%Matt Brown: 2.5%AP News: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic17.8%This article: 2.4%Matt Brown: 0.9%AP News: 0.4%Hindsight Bias2.4%This article: 4.6%Matt Brown: 2.0%AP News: 1.6%Overconfidence Bias4.6%This article: 5.4%Matt Brown: 11.7%AP News: 8.0%Framing Effect5.4%This article: 1.3%Matt Brown: 0.5%AP News: 0.4%Loss Aversion1.3%This article: 3.3%Matt Brown: 1.2%AP News: 0.5%Status Quo Bias3.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 1.6%Matt Brown: 1.2%AP News: 2.2%Optimism Bias1.6%This article: 7.0%Matt Brown: 4.8%AP News: 2.1%Pessimism Bias7.0%This article: 26.1%Matt Brown: 10.5%AP News: 9.6%Negativity Bias26.1%This article: 1.0%Matt Brown: 0.9%AP News: 1.7%Self-Serving Bias1.0%This article: 6.0%Matt Brown: 2.0%AP News: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error6.0%This article: 3.9%Matt Brown: 0.7%AP News: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias3.9%This article: 2.8%Matt Brown: 3.9%AP News: 1.1%In-Group Bias2.8%This article: 1.5%Matt Brown: 0.6%AP News: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias1.5%This article: 5.5%Matt Brown: 1.4%AP News: 1.4%Halo Effect5.5%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.6%Matt Brown: 1.6%AP News: 1.3%Recency Bias0.6%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 0.2%AP News: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 2.4%AP News: 0.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 0.8%AP News: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.4%Matt Brown: 3.1%AP News: 3.7%Appeal to Authority7.4%This article: 8.5%Matt Brown: 2.5%AP News: 1.2%False Dilemma8.5%This article: 1.3%Matt Brown: 1.8%AP News: 0.8%Slippery Slope1.3%This article: 3.3%Matt Brown: 0.9%AP News: 0.1%Circular Reasoning3.3%This article: 6.1%Matt Brown: 7.8%AP News: 2.5%Hasty Generalization6.1%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.2%Matt Brown: 0.6%AP News: 0.3%Bandwagon2.2%This article: 8.8%Matt Brown: 7.8%AP News: 4.7%Appeal to Emotion8.8%This article: 7.1%Matt Brown: 2.4%AP News: 0.6%Begging the Question7.1%This article: 10.0%Matt Brown: 2.1%AP News: 2.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)10.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 1.0%AP News: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 1.0%Matt Brown: 0.5%AP News: 0.4%Burden of Proof1.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 8.3%Matt Brown: 1.1%AP News: 0.2%Composition/Division8.3%This article: 8.9%Matt Brown: 1.7%AP News: 1.2%Anecdotal8.9%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 0.1%AP News: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 5.7%Matt Brown: 1.2%AP News: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)5.7%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 0.0%AP News: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.8%Matt Brown: 0.2%AP News: 0.1%Special Pleading0.8%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 0.5%AP News: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.7%Matt Brown: 0.7%AP News: 2.0%Unattributed Quote0.7%This article: 1.2%Matt Brown: 1.4%AP News: 1.2%Quote-first Misdirection1.2%This article: 17.1%Matt Brown: 3.8%AP News: 3.1%Biased Writer Voice17.1%This article: 1.3%Matt Brown: 0.3%AP News: 0.6%Indoctrination1.3%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 4.7%AP News: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 7.2%Matt Brown: 1.2%AP News: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias7.2%This article: 0.0%Matt Brown: 0.1%AP News: 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1337 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers26%attributed speech987writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Fowler • 9 words • 100.0% coverageSteve Fowler • 25 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Fowler • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 54 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Stevens • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 38 words • 0.0% coverageSam Wilson • 4 words • 0.0% coverageSam Wilson • 11 words • 0.0% coverageSam Wilson • 18 words • 0.0% coverageSam Wilson • 11 words • 0.0% coverageSam Wilson • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageEric Holder • 55 words • 0.0% coverageEric Holder • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageSteve Cohen • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Cohen • 3 words • 0.0% coverageSteve Cohen • 10 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Goodman • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Goodman • 12 words • 0.0% coverageThomas Goodman • 44 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageChris Wiley • 16 words • 0.0% coverageChris Wiley • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageChris Wiley • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Eric Holder

100%flagged-word coverage
67 attributed words19% of attributed speech96% writer coverage
0%12.5%25.0%Biased Writer Voice-23.1 ptsWriter: 23.1%Eric Holder: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -9.7 ptsWriter: 9.7%Eric Holder: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Eric Holder: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.6 ptsWriter: 1.6%Eric Holder: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.