Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 794 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Vatican Relations results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 926 hits . Analysis detected 3,777 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,176 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,960 of 37,536 keywords). This U S Vatican Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group. U S Vatican Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 3,176
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.5% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 29.2% 29.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Keyword 29.2%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst