Keyword summary
0% 13 analyzed articles/videos 2,197 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.s.-China Relations results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 27.4% saturation with 2,910 hits . Analysis detected 18,178 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,612 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of 74% (9,833 of 37,536 keywords). This U.s.-China Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group. U.s.-China Relations
Keyword details
Total words: 10,612
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
74% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.8% percentile 4.3% BS Score13 analyzed articles10.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 21.6% 21.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 27.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 21.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 6.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.8% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst