Keyword summary
58%6 analyzed articles/videos2,433 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U S Central Command results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 2,176 hits. Analysis detected 12,887 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,297 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,525 of 37,341 keywords). This U S Central Command is better (less manipulative) than 76.40% of the peer group.
U S Central Command

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510023.6% percentile
2.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles16.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate