Keyword summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 6,559 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Type 2 Diabetes results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.2% saturation with 1,623 hits . Analysis detected 13,897 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,236 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (33,338 of 34,832 keywords). This Type 2 Diabetes is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group. Type 2 Diabetes
Keyword details
Total words: 26,236
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.3% percentile 1.3% BS Score6 analyzed articles26.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst