Keyword summary
⁠87%2 analyzed articles/videos744 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Transplant results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 24.3% saturation with 867 hits. Analysis detected 3,167 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,570 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (13,491 of 37,536 keywords). This Transplant is worse (more manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group.
Transplant
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠65%Transplant (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,570
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

64% percentile
025507510064.1% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 24.3%24.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 24.3%, sitewide 6.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.9%No True Scotsman: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos