Keyword summary
86% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,156 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Cook results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 2,750 hits . Analysis detected 22,301 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,170 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (25,746 of 35,661 keywords). This Tim Cook is better (less manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group. Tim Cook
Keyword details
Total words: 22,170
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles22.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst