Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Theresa May results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 1,017 hits. Analysis detected 8,268 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,232 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 73% (10,454 of 37,536 keywords). This Theresa May is worse (more manipulative) than 72.20% of the peer group.
Theresa May
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
73%Theresa May (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,232
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

72% percentile
025507510072.2% percentile
4.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.9%9.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.3%16.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 15.5%15.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.2%14.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 15.5%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 3.3%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 1.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos