Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,169 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Markup results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 1,125 hits. Analysis detected 7,277 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,676 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 42% (21,916 of 37,536 keywords). This The Markup is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group.
The Markup
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
42%The Markup (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,676
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

42% percentile
025507510041.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 13.0%13.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate