Keyword summary
72%2 analyzed articles/videos3,147 analyzed words
BS Summary: These The Catcher In The Rye results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 2,759 hits. Analysis detected 14,546 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,259 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (16,277 of 37,536 keywords). This The Catcher In The Rye is worse (more manipulative) than 56.60% of the peer group.
The Catcher In The Rye
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
57%The Catcher In The Rye (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,259
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

57% percentile
025507510056.6% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 24.5%24.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 24.5%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos