Keyword summary
⁠9%5 analyzed articles/videos2,235 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Tech results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.7% saturation with 809 hits. Analysis detected 7,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,238 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (35,899 of 37,536 keywords). This Texas Tech is better (less manipulative) than 95.60% of the peer group.
Texas Tech
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠5%Texas Tech (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751004.4% percentile
1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos