Keyword summary
47% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,476 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Texas Politics results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 2,342 hits . Analysis detected 11,817 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,276 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (31,560 of 35,607 keywords). This Texas Politics is better (less manipulative) than 88.60% of the peer group. Texas Politics
Keyword details
Total words: 16,276
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.4% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles16.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst