Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,868 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tehran (iran) results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 1,057 hits. Analysis detected 5,498 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,472 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,710 of 37,326 keywords). This Tehran (iran) is better (less manipulative) than 60.80% of the peer group.
Tehran (iran)
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
40%Tehran (iran) (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

39% percentile
025507510039.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 10.4%10.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.2%14.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos