Keyword summary
56% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,190 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ted Sarandos results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 529 hits . Analysis detected 4,514 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,407 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,688 of 37,533 keywords). This Ted Sarandos is better (less manipulative) than 52.50% of the peer group. Ted Sarandos
Keyword details
Total words: 4,407
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst