Keyword summary
45% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,273 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ted Lasso results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 2,795 hits . Analysis detected 14,728 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,877 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 60% (15,178 of 37,536 keywords). This Ted Lasso is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group. Ted Lasso
Keyword details
Total words: 10,877
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.6% percentile 3.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 25.7% 25.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 25.7%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst