Keyword summary
97% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,061 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tech Innovation results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 31.2% saturation with 2,303 hits . Analysis detected 10,074 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,382 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,171 of 37,536 keywords). This Tech Innovation is worse (more manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Tech Innovation
Keyword details
Total words: 7,382
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.6% percentile 3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 31.2% 31.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Optimism Bias: Keyword 31.2%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 5.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst