Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 992 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Taxing The Rich results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 588 hits . Analysis detected 3,807 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,968 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,255 of 37,536 keywords). This Taxing The Rich is better (less manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group. Taxing The Rich
Keyword details
Total words: 3,968
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.7% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst