Gothamist77%

How Hochul and Mamdani forged a compromise over taxing the rich 0%

By Elizabeth Kim84% Jon Campbell0% Jimmy Vielkind0%

4/16/2026, 4:01:09 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 137 hits. Analysis detected 909 faulty-reasoning hits from 992 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the article peer group.

When Mayor Zohran Mamdani endorsed Gov. 
Kathy Hochul in February, some on the left expressed shock and frustration. 
To them, the mayor had given away his greatest source of leverage in pushing the governor to tax the rich. 
Now, the two Democrats have reached a mutually beneficial compromise through a pied-à-terre tax proposal aimed at ultrawealthy second-home owners. 
The mayor, a democratic socialist, can claim a political victory of having moved the needle on a wealth tax, while the governor, a moderate who has opposed taxing the rich, can seek to end a contentious budget battle during a re-election year. 
The deal appears to have cooled rising tensions between two elected officials who need one another. 
“From her standpoint, she has stayed firm to what she has said,” said Jay Jacobs, the state Democratic Party chair. 
“The mayor, for his part, needs more money to fill his budget gap. 
This provides a good amount. 
Everybody ought to end up happy on this.” 
Talks about the pied-à-terre proposal turned serious in recent weeks, two sources familiar with the matter said. 
The mayor and governor spoke about the proposal on the phone earlier in the week. 
The mayor’s team has pushed for additional revenue to plug a $5.4 billion budget gap and floated several ideas, including raising income and corporate taxes, which the moderate governor shot down. 
Other ideas, like paring back a tax break used by lawyers and other professionals, were also bandied about, said the sources, who requested anonymity to describe private talks. 
They settled this month on a pied-à-terre tax, a long-proposed idea that was last seriously floated in 2019. 
The governor won over City Hall on the proposal before sharing it with Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie and Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins, Stewart-Cousins said. 
The legislative leaders learned of the plan after the close of business on Tuesday  just hours before the New York Times first reported on Hochul’s plan. 
Democratic strategist Evan Roth Smith said the tax proposal serves as a much-needed “off-ramp” amid intensifying budget battles in both Albany and New York City. 
He said he had heard last year that a pied-à-terre was on a list of “doable things” that Hochul had provided the mayor. 
“Mamdani gets to take a win to his coalition. 
Hochul looks like she can govern and manage the mayor,” Smith said. 
“And they both maintain the comity of their alliance.” 
The mayor and his allies were quick to take a victory lap on Wednesday, but Mamdani also credited Hochul. 
“Thanks to the support of Governor Hochul, we are one step closer to balancing our budget by taxing the ultra-wealthy and global elites with a pied-à-terre tax  the first of its kind in our state,” Mamdani said in a statement. 
“Alongside the governor, our administration is fighting every day to make sure we address this fiscal deficit fairly, where the wealthy contribute what they owe and our budget reflects our commitment to the working New Yorkers being priced out of our city.” 
Hochul won over City Hall before sharing the pied-à-terre proposal with Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie and Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins. 
In a statement on X, the New York City chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America said, “Hochul just BLINKED in the standoff over taxes on the rich.” 
“Our pressure is working,” the group added. 
On Wednesday, Hochul denied that her proposal was intended to appease the left. 
She said she prefers the pied-à-terre tax because it primarily applies to people living out of the state  or even out of the country. 
“There are literally Russian oligarchs buying up properties, driving up the property values, and that has an effect,” Hochul said. 
“Now, they're all welcome to stay. 
But I think there's a logic behind them also contributing to the city because they're here because this is a great city and it has so much to offer.” 
The governor reiterated her opposition to income and corporate tax hikes, but didn't close the door on other forms of tax increases when given the opportunity. 
She has also said that the proposal came from her and that the City Council will have to come up with additional savings on its own. 
“As they're diving into it, I'm asking them to consider some other areas where costs can be managed in a different way,” Hochul said. 
“So we're not done yet, but also it is the responsibility of the mayor and the City Council to find more savings.” 
The pied-à-terre tax would require legislative approval as part of the state budget, which is now more than two weeks late as Hochul and leaders struggle to reach a consensus on the governor's top policy proposals. 
Stewart-Cousins, a Yonkers Democrat, said she has supported similar proposals in the past and shares the goal of helping New York City. 
But, she said, other municipalities are also facing fiscal shortfalls. 
“We have all understood how important it is to help the city. 
We understand the city's an economic driver for the entire state,” Stewart-Cousins said. 
“This just got on the table yesterday. 
 I think that we are trying to figure out, when it comes to whatever region of the state, what works for that region. 
There's no one-size-fits-all.” 
But how far the deal goes in satisfying the left may depend on other unresolved issues in the budget negotiations. 
Progressives have objected to Hochul's proposal to delay implementing a landmark climate law and are urging her and the Legislature to provide more funding for affordable housing and pass legislation that provides greater protections for undocumented immigrants. 
“If you look at the breadth of reactions, I don't think this stops anyone from demanding higher taxes on the rich,” said Jasmine Gripper, director of the Working Families Party. 
“No one is like 'Thank you, you can stop now.' 
Everyone is looking to push for more.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 4.6%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Elizabeth Kim: 4.7%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic2.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 1.1%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Elizabeth Kim: 15.2%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect8.8%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.4%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.4%Elizabeth Kim: 1.0%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 6.6%Elizabeth Kim: 3.9%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias6.6%This article: 5.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias5.0%This article: 6.7%Elizabeth Kim: 12.2%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias6.7%This article: 11.6%Elizabeth Kim: 3.1%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias11.6%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.8%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 5.1%Elizabeth Kim: 4.8%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias5.1%This article: 2.5%Elizabeth Kim: 1.2%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias2.5%This article: 3.3%Elizabeth Kim: 2.3%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect3.3%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Elizabeth Kim: 2.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem2.8%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 4.3%Elizabeth Kim: 3.2%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority4.3%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 2.1%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.0%Elizabeth Kim: 4.4%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization2.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 1.0%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 2.9%Elizabeth Kim: 7.0%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion2.9%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 1.5%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.7%Elizabeth Kim: 3.0%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.7%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 3.0%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.3%Elizabeth Kim: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.3%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.5%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 6.9%Elizabeth Kim: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote6.9%This article: 2.8%Elizabeth Kim: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection2.8%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 4.3%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.8%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 13.8%Elizabeth Kim: 2.0%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias13.8%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.2%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Elizabeth Kim: 0.3%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

992 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers54%attributed speech461writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageJay Jacobs • 20 words • 0.0% coverageJay Jacobs • 13 words • 0.0% coverageJay Jacobs • 5 words • 0.0% coverageJay Jacobs • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageAndrea Stewart-Cousins • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageEvan Roth Smith • 25 words • 0.0% coverageEvan Roth Smith • 23 words • 100.0% coverageEvan Roth Smith • 9 words • 0.0% coverageEvan Roth Smith • 12 words • 0.0% coverageEvan Roth Smith • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 41 words • 0.0% coverageZohran Mamdani • 42 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageNew York City chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America • 28 words • 100.0% coverageNew York City chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 6 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 24 words • 0.0% coverageKathy Hochul • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageAndrea Stewart-Cousins • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAndrea Stewart-Cousins • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAndrea Stewart-Cousins • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAndrea Stewart-Cousins • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAndrea Stewart-Cousins • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAndrea Stewart-Cousins • 24 words • 0.0% coverageAndrea Stewart-Cousins • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageJasmine Gripper • 30 words • 100.0% coverageJasmine Gripper • 10 words • 0.0% coverageJasmine Gripper • 7 words • 0.0% coverage
35 attributed words6.6% of attributed speech66% writer coverage
0%40.0%80.0%Quote-first Misdirection+80.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%New York City chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America: 80.0%80.0%Politically Left Leaning B+72.0 ptsWriter: 8.0%New York City chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America: 80.0%80.0%Unattributed Quote-9.8 ptsWriter: 9.8%New York City chapter of the Democratic Socialists of America: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.