Keyword summary
52% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,513 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tariffs And Global Trade results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,992 hits . Analysis detected 11,575 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,526 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (33,233 of 37,533 keywords). This Tariffs And Global Trade is better (less manipulative) than 88.50% of the peer group. Tariffs And Global Trade
Keyword details
Total words: 17,526
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score5 analyzed articles17.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst