Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video979 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KATIE MARIE DAVIES results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 388 hits. Analysis detected 3,002 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,916 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 47% (3,403 of 6,366 authors). This KATIE MARIE DAVIES is better (less manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
KATIE MARIE DAVIES
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
47%KATIE MARIE DAVIES (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,916
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510046.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.5%8.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.1%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos