Keyword summary
â 0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 4,018 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Takimag results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22.2% saturation with 3,811 hits . Analysis detected 29,400 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,194 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of â 62% (14,367 of 37,536 keywords). This Takimag is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group. Takimag
Keyword details
Total words: 17,194
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.7% percentile 3.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 22.2% 22.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 19.2% 19.2% Politically Right Leaning⌠Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 15.0% 15.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 10.3% 10.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 22.2%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 15.0%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 2.2% Straw Man: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst