Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Taki results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Hindsight Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 467 hits . Analysis detected 2,777 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,637 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Taki is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Taki
Author details
Total words: 2,637
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 17.7% 17.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 16.3% 16.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.8% 6.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 7.7% 7.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 16.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst