Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,051 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Theodore Dalrymple results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Slippery Slope, and Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 553 hits. Analysis detected 4,780 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,204 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 60% (2,625 of 6,497 authors). This Theodore Dalrymple is worse (more manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Theodore Dalrymple
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
60%Theodore Dalrymple (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,204
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

60% percentile
025507510059.6% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 13.2%13.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Author 9.5%9.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.8%4.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Author 6.2%6.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.8%0.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 13.2%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 12.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Slippery Slope: Author 9.5%, sitewide 1.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Author 6.4%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.3%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos