Keyword summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,995 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sydney Sweeney results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 3,264 hits . Analysis detected 16,949 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,287 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (19,644 of 37,533 keywords). This Sydney Sweeney is better (less manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group. Sydney Sweeney
Keyword details
Total words: 13,287
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.7% percentile 2.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 24.6% 24.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.3% 13.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst